This section walks you through the investigation workflow in Supervizor X, accessible from the Start investigation button in Result investigation.
Jump to :
- Investigation workflow
- Bulk actions
- Ignoring a result
Workflow review
Step 1 — Start the investigation
From the result screen, click Start investigation.
ℹ️ Info — The result status automatically switches from Not started to In progress.
📝 Note — Every action taken during the investigation workflow (status changes, conclusions, comments, attachments) is automatically logged in the Activity tab of the collaboration panel.
Step 2 - Complete the investigation
Once you've finished investigating, click Complete investigation.
After clicking, Supervizor won't close the result immediately — a conclusion modal appears, asking you to qualify your investigation before submitting.
Step 2.5 - Transition to the modal
Supervizor requires you to document your findings before closing a result. The conclusion modal prompts you to select an outcome and optionally add context before confirming.
Step 3 - Conclusion modal
The modal has 4 elements:
Badge | Name | Description |
Badge 1 | Conclusion | | Choose between Anomaly or Not an anomaly |
|
Badge 2 | Sub-conclusion | | Dropdown to refine your conclusion. See the detail below. |
|
|
Badge 3 | Comment | | Free-text field to explain your findings. You can also mention a colleague with @ and attach a file. |
|
|
Badge 4 | Submit | Confirm and close the modal.
|
|
|
⚠️ Important — Once submitted, the conclusion cannot be modified and the result status automatically switches from In progress to Done.
🔴 Anomaly — available sub-conclusions
Sous-conclusion | Description |
Human error | | Incorrect information manually entered into the system |
|
Omission error | | Required fields left blank or incomplete |
|
|
Failing process | | Recurring errors revealing unclear or broken processes |
|
|
System limitation | | The system failed to prevent the error or allowed a workaround |
|
|
Policy non-compliance | | Unintentional breach of documented rules or controls |
|
|
| Fraud or intentional misconduct | | Deliberate circumvention of established rules |
|
|
Other anomaly | Any issue not covered by the categories above
|
|
|
🟢 Not an anomaly — available sub-conclusions
| Sub-conclusion | Description |
| Legitimate exception with approval |
| A deviation from standard policy that has been properly documented and officially approved |
| Compliant with process | | The transaction follows established processes and controls |
|
|
|
| Data error | | Source data is systematically missing or incorrect |
|
|
|
| Control logic error | | Source data is correct, but the control rule or calculation appears to be wrong |
|
|
|